Ckdepi cystatin c 2012 ckdepi creatininecystatin c 2012 all ethnic groups other than african american shortcut. Pdf glomerular filtration rate gfr estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease. Research article open access performance of cockcroft. The people who meet our operational definition of the target population research sample. This allows for comparison of the mdrd 4 and ckdepi formulas across a wide range of ages. Mdrd or ckdepi study equations for estimating prevalence of. Equations developed by the mdrd study group and ckdepi. Population and methods the studied population was the same as that from a previous study 11. We hypothesized that the high prevalence of ckd unawareness would be. Chronic kidney disease ckd is becoming a major public health problem worldwide.
Only one study stratified the prevalence of ckd based on age. Study documents mdrd manual protocol procedure forms moop protocol data dictionary pdf 4. The odds ratio 95 % ci for risk factors associated with ckd screened in general population by the mdrd and the ckdepi equations after adjustment for. In the nonckd but obese population, the indication for gfr measurement was an imminent. Introduction of the ckdepi equation to estimate glomerular. Age and genderspecific reference values of estimated gfr. Are the creatininebased equations accurate to estimate. Apr 06, 2012 the odds ratio 95 % ci for risk factors associated with ckd screened in general population by the mdrd and the ckdepi equations after adjustment for age, gender, study period and study area. In the mdrd study population, 91% of gfr estimates were within 30% of the measured values and the equation explained 90. Creatininebased equations for the adjustment of drug dosage.
Implications of the ckdepi gfr estimation equation in. Chapter 3 research design, research method and population 3. This large number of esrd patients could be just the tip of the iceberg of an increasing number of patients with chronic kidney disease ckd. Multicenter epidemiological study to assess the population of ckd patients in greece. Comparison of risk prediction using the ckdepi equation and. Mdrd equations for estimation of gfr in renal transplant. Gfr is estimated by the mdrd study equation and by the new ckdepi equations. Of 123,704 eligible keep participants, 116,321 with data available for this analysis were included. However, the taiwanese mdrd equation had higher concordance. The published nejm table 1 breaks down the mdrd study populations sample size by study 1 or 2, diet group usual, low protein, or very low protein, and blood pressure group usual or low. Comparison of ckd awareness in a screening population using. Revised equations for estimated gfr from serum creatinine. Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the chronic. The nijmegen biomedical study is a population based study with a sample stratified by age and gender.
Background the relationship between the proteinenergy nutritional status and renal function was assessed in 1785 clinically stable patients with moderate to advanced chronic renal failure who were evaluated during the baseline phase of the. Performance of the cockcroftgault, mdrd, and new ckdepi. Agestratified, randomly selected inhabitants received a. Differences in creatinine excretion, body weight, and bmi between participants in our study and the mdrd study are consistent with studies that have shown a mean skeletal muscle mass assessed by means of magnetic resonance imaging data significantly less in japanese men, 24. Serum cystatin c as a marker of glomerular filtration rate curr opin nephrol hypertens. We appreciated the excellent article by stevens et al1 on the comparison of drug dosing recommendations based on measured glomerular filtration rate and kidney functionestimating equations. The ckdepi equation performed better than the mdrd modification of diet in renal disease study equation, especially at higher gfr, with less bias and greater accuracy. Gfr estimation using the cockcroftgault, mdrd study, and.
Evaluation of the modification of diet in renal disease study equation in a large diverse population j am soc nephrol. Comparison of risk prediction using the ckdepi equation. Comparison of the ckd epidemiology collaboration ckdepi. Age and genderspecific reference values of estimated gfr in. Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal. Relationship between nutritional status and the glomerular filtration rate. Pdf comparison of the mdrd study and the ckdepi study. Using the modification of diet in renal disease mdrd and. Comparison of the mdrd study and ckdepi equations for the.
Mdrd study 2006 same as above reexpressed for standardized assay. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease ckd in the japanese. The main contribution of this report was that the ckdepi equation identified 24% of patients with mild reduced egfr, not identified using the mdrd equation. The ckdepi equation and mdrd study equation find similar. Type underlined letters to toggle between variables. Pdf multicenter epidemiological study to assess the. Summary of the mdrd study and ckdepi estimating equations. Both cockcroftgault and abbreviated mdrd have been compared in the same population against a gold standard method for estimating gfr 4 8. In the entire population, the cg equation underestimated measured gfr p mdrd study and ckdepi equations were not significantly different from zero p 0.
Use of the mdrd study equation for drug dosing american. It estimates gfr adjusted for body surface area4 and is more accurate than measured creatinine clearance from. Although the study reflected a diverse population, it failed to provide detailed information about subgroups, including the elderly. Several studies have compared drug dosing recommendations. At the time of the modification of diet in renal disease mdrd trial in 1994, studies had shown that dietary protein restriction and blood pressure control delayed the progression of renal disease in animal models. In addition, the limitations and the study population of the original trials from. May 09, 2012 mean egfr was higher computed by the ckdepi equation than the mdrd study equation in the general population 88. The resulting study population is easily described by a tree diagram.
The reference population was arbitrarily chosen to be the caucasians. Dec 15, 2009 levey and colleagues 1 presented a new equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate gfr, the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration ckdepi, and compared the prevalence of chronic kidney disease ckd in the u. Glomerular filtration rate gfr was estimated using the mdrd study egfr mdrd and ckdepi egfr ckdepi equations with creatinine level calibrated to standardized methods. Relationship between nutritional status and the glomerular. The members of the study population from whom we collect our data target population. However, the ckdepi equation was more accurate in a subgroup with egfr between 60 and 120 mlmin1. Revised equations for estimated gfr from serum creatinine in. Estimation of renal function by ckdepi versus mdrd in a. Mdrd study and ckdepi gfr estimating equations summary ta. The group of people to whom we want our research results to apply study population. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. In the entire population, the cg equation underestimated measured gfr p rate. The ckdepi equation is as accurate as the mdrd study equation currently reported by laboratories in the subgroup with estimated gfr less than 60 mlmin1. As shown in the figure below, the ckdepi equation and the mdrd study equation were equally accurate in a subgroup with estimated gfr egfr less than 60 mlmin1.
Development and validation of a more accurate estimating equation. The prevalence of stage 3 ckd in this population using the mdrd or the ckdepi equations was 11. When looking at nhanes national health and nutrition examination survey data, the median estimated gfr was 94. The reliability and validity of the research instrument are addressed. The mdrd study equation was developed in 1999 with data from a study of 1628 people using nonstandardized serum creatinine assays and reexpressed for use with standardized creatinine in 2006. Study population number of subjects development, validation assays equation advantages references creatinine egfrcr mdrd study 1999 ckd 1628 1628, 0 nonstandardized mdrd study creatinine 1999 recommended by nkfkdoqi 2002 levey et al. In the mdrd study population, 91% of gfr estimates were within. Levey and colleagues 1 presented a new equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate gfr, the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration ckdepi, and compared the prevalence of chronic kidney disease ckd in the u. The 4variable mdrd study equation was developed in 1999 using data from 1628 patients with ckd with gfr from approximately 5 to 90 milliliters per minute per 1. Background and objectives chronic kidney disease ckd is a significant public health problem whose diagnosis and staging relies upon gfrestimating equations, including the new ckdepi equation. Both equations were derived from large population studies and will generate an estimate of the mean gfr in a population of patients with the same age, gender, race, and serum creatinine. Results from the prestar study article pdf available in plos one 9. As part of the overall study, we provide reference values of estimated glomerular filtration rate gfr for this caucasian population without expressed risk. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in populationbased.
Methods study population to investigate renal function as calculated by the cg, mdrd and ckdepi equations, a cohort of subjects aged 20 to 85 years was used study 1. Our first tabulation from the archived dataset table 1 produced counts that are identical to the published table. Actually, the prevalence of stage 3 ckd in the global population national health and nutrition examination survey nhanes study logically lowers in the global and caucasian population using the ckdepi equation compared with the mdrd study equation 6. The nijmegen biomedical study is a population based crosssectional study conducted in the eastern part of the netherlands. Estimated glomerular filtration rate egfr calculated using either the mdrd study equation or the ckdepi equation is an estimate of gfr, not the actual gfr. Patients treated with glucocorticoids, cimetidine or trimethoprim were excluded. When the entire study population was considered, the cg and mdrd equations showed very. In line with observations in the general population, this study suggests that the mdrd equation may underestimate renal function in subjects with gfrs over 60 mlmin1. We assessed the consequences of introducing the ckdepi equation in our caucasian population. Comparison of ckd awareness in a screening population. The mdrd study equation has been derived from 1628 patients. Research article open access performance of cockcroftgault. As of january 20, many large commercial clinical laboratories have changed from using the mdrd study equation to the ckdepi creatine 2009 equation for egfr reporting.
The population screened consisted in 1992 people 47% of men. Gfr estimation by the mdrd equation using a standardized. Pdf concordance of ckd stages in estimation by the ckdepi. Previous studies that compared the mdrd study equation with the ckdepi equation in korea targeted patients with specific diseases such. The nijmegen biomedical study is a populationbased crosssectional study conducted in the eastern part of the netherlands. The ckdepi equation was developed in 2009 using a diverse population estimate gfr from serum creatinine, age, sex and race. Ckdepi demonstrated superior performance compared with the existing mdrd equation but has not been applied to a healthcare system. The mdrd trial sought to assess whether dietary and blood pressure changes can similarly delay worsening renal. The number of patients with endstage renal disease esrd in japan has continuously increased in the past three decades. Modification of diet in renal disease mdrd study and ckd. Ckd stage distribution in the korean general population. Pdf evaluation of the modification of diet in renal disease study.
322 1449 425 352 901 1236 925 334 597 725 1458 836 950 135 1435 188 1040 472 992 660 1405 267 886 233 35 1017 651 1483 321 1374 902 1164 685 1196 46 1254 523 534 1219 186 1104 82 250 1321 107